Vargas Teaching Theory Analysis

Vargas Teaching Theory digestQuestion aneWhat be your ideas of training? How does that compare with or contrast to Vargas perspective? coiffureMy ideas of instruct is to fix a positive impact on my students in terms of their cognitive domain, affective domain and psychomotor domain. As a professional teacher, I understand that students have different learning styles and that is wherefore my ideas of teaching and method of delivering instructions focuses on student center fundament on the wholey the 4Cs (collaboration, communication, critical thinking and creativity). I want students to have freedom of carriage which gives room to open treatment and creativity. This boost their level of confidence and force to express themselves out there any time. And in the long run, my Ideas of teaching is to challenge my students, cod them grow to their full potential, develop together for the betterment of every nonpareil.Comparing my ideas of teaching with Vargas perspective, Vargas (2013) believes teaching is not just presenting to an empty class and we both have similar ideas on how teaching should be basically by learned the students better, work on their sort in every area and finally she doesnt think knowing the subject matter is a major divisor on how students feel or perceive change in their spot (p. 5). Which I totally I agree with her on this.Question twoBriefly summarize Skinners perspective as it relates to bearingAnswerSkinner, B.F. believed that the surround is a major determinant of doings. Skinners perspective people have pursuant(predicate) behavior pattern because they have kinds of response tendencies (Vargas, 2013). He made a discover that most behavior is not the reaction to a input that it depends upon its do on the immediate environment. Vargas also stated in her mass that Skinner believed that it was the consequences of individual actions and not antecedent stimulus that determined what the animals did. He called the behavior operant (p. 8).Question threeWhat is your interpretation of Behavior Analysis? Support your answer with detail from the text.AnswerMy interpretation of behavior outline is that it is a natural science that seeks to understand the behavior of individuals. Vargas (2013) exempted that behavior digest is a discipline based on the science first abide by by B.F. Skinner and the practices of operant condition have spread to all areas of behavior including animal training, business, clinical work, health and teaching. It is the science of behavior of humans and non-humans (p. 9).Question fourHow bath the banter What is a Cause (page 21), attend the classroom teacher?AnswerThe discussion what is a cause result suspensor the classroom teacher to focus on conditions or events on which an event or behavior depend on (Vargas, 2013). It testament help teachers to learn and adopt strategies to improve behavior. Also what is a cause discussion on p. 21 pull up stakes help teachers to know more or so dependant and independent variables. With this, teachers will know more just about the total of problems, assignment completed by the students. It will help them to sense what could be responsible for a behavior to identify functional relations amidst the behavior.And finally, the way the next generation behave will determine a countrys future more than any other resources within its borders (Vargas, 2013, p. 3). She believes teachers are expect to teach more while they receive more difficult students (p. 4). It is substantial to understand behavior of these students, it is very important to define the variables responsible for these behaviors. Vargas stated that Finding the causes becomes a search for functional relations among all the contingencies that occur in a setting (p. 22). This is exactly what is a cause discussion explained in details on page 21 of the text which will help the teachers a lot.Question fiveWhat new information did you find in chapter 2? Please explain.AnswerThe new information imbed in chapter 2 of the text behavior analytic thinking for effective teaching is the functional relation which is a systematic relationship between dependent and independent variables. Independent variable explained as circular score or explanatory fiction which is a statement that has the form of an explanation, but in which the cause essentially restates the behavior to be explained while a mentalistics explanation relies on activities of a hypothesized mind to explain behavior (Vargas, 2013, pp. 22-23).Chapter 2 tries to explain more about Independent variables which buttress more points on behavior which can be circular or mentalistics.Question sixWhat did you already know about Pavlov and his guess? After reading about Pavlov in chapter 3, what did you learn about his possible action?AnswerWhat I knew about Pavlov and his theory was that he was the one who discovered answering conditioning and he believed that respondent beh avior is controlled by a stimulus. But after reading about him from the text, I learnt that Pavlovs discovery was titled conditional reflexes instead of respondent conditioning (Vargas, 2013). The principle involves respondent behavior which occurs in response to a particular stimulus as part of a reflex. He believes reflexes consist of item physiological reactions to a specific stimulus (pp. 8-9).What I learnt about his theory as a professional teacher is to be a severe observer and a sober exploreer because it was due to his ability to research and observe that made him noticed something surprising about his dogs salivating before the nutrition was put into their mouths. This is where his investigation began. As a teacher, we must research and observe what different behaviors of students must do with their learning.Question sevenDefine the reproof Trap? Have you ever played a role in the criticism trap? Explain.AnswerVargas (2013) defined Criticism trap as a situation where criticizing a behavior you dislike or you deficiency to decrease seems to work because it temporarily decreases or stop the behavior, but criticizing it strengthens the behavior so that it occurs more oftentimes in the future.Yes, I had played a role. This happened to me and my wife with our little son at age 2. Anywhere we are going out, hes always excited to follow us but one thing he does is wearing his fit out or slippers the wrongly. After this, we will criticize him always for wearing his shoes wrongly, then he corrects himself and does it once more and again. One day we realized criticizing him to correct him didnt work for him, so we take a method to correct him. Any time he wears his shoes wrongly, we will calmly correct him and once he does that, we tell him good boy or thats my boy and since then, he wears his shoes correctly and never wears them wrongly.What we learnt from the situation above is that we should praise imperfection and reward approximation the behavio r we are looking for. And its working till now.Question eightHow can teachers use the information found in chapter 3?AnswerAs a teacher, lets start from the criticism trap, we shouldnt criticize ourselves too much because in the long run, you will find yourself criticizing your students. We should learn to use praise frequently and use criticism relatively infrequently especially in the classroom. With these, we wont have problems with students.Another information here is punishment. Teachers must know the consequence of punishing a child because punishment has a bad effect on the punisher as well as on the recipients of the treatments (Vargas, 2013, p. 51).ReferencesVargas, J.S. (2013). Behavior analysis for effective teaching (2nd ed.). New York, NY Routledge.